RI Op Ed: Crony Capitalism: your leaders are an investment risk!

Informational advantage gained by insiders can have a wide range of negative consequences for honest investors.

Subscribe to Responsible Investor

James Madison, the fourth President of the United States, once opined, “wherever there is an interest and power to do wrong, wrong will generally be done, and not less readily by a powerful and interested party than by a powerful and interested prince.” Unfortunately, his concern about the inevitability of cross-class corruption in our then newly formed nation has proven accurate and prescient. Loss of trust and faith in our political leaders is evident in the results of respected polls. For instance, a recent Gallup Poll (1) demonstrates an overall congressional approval rating of 14%. This degree of dissatisfaction no doubt results from public sentiment expressed in responses to a Rasmussen Poll (2) conducted in 2012, which found that 68% of voters, “believe government and big business work together against the rest of us” and a Transparency International (3) survey, which found that 72% of Americans feel that both the governments’ efforts to fight corruption are ineffective and that from 2007 – 2010 the level of government corruption increased. Capturing the publics’ standpoint more precisely is an October 2, 2014 Rasmussen Poll (4), which revealed that 63% of voters think most members of Congress are willing to sell their vote for either cash or a campaign contribution, and 59% think it’s likely their own representative already has!
The pernicious, mutually beneficial financial relationship between Corporate America and Congress that perpetuates “business as usual” and political gridlock is referred to as crony capitalism. More formally, the Financial Times (5) defines crony capitalism as: an often inefficient and corrupt system of business in which family and friends are favoured for government or company contracts, even if better candidates are available.” Investopedia (6) adds an element of the implications thereof with its definition: [a] description of capitalist society as being based on the close relationships between businessmen and the state. Instead of success being determined by a free market and the rule of law, the success of a business is dependent on the favoritism that is shown to it by the ruling government in the form of tax breaks, government grants and other incentives.”The quid pro quo nature of the relationships referred to above and the immense mutual financial benefits that accrue from them are well documented, such as in this chart (7) that depicts the most popular congressional investments and this list (8) of industry donations to members of congress. As a result of unbridled freedoms granted to corporations in the Citizens’ United decision, the amount of the latter has ballooned. In fact, the figure for the recent US mid-term elections exceeded $4,000,000,000.00; an unprecedented sum. Accounts of these bed fellowships offer detailed expositions of financial windfalls that result. Peter Schweizer’s latest contribution to the subject is, “Extortion: How Politicians Extract Your Money, Buy Votes and Line Their Own Pockets.” While in a broader economic sense, “The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future, by Joseph Stiglitz, David Stockman’s “The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America,” and Robert Monk’s “Corporacy” are three additional, well documented sources of information that delve into the ill-effects of crony capitalism. Two daily accounts of the financial misdeeds of crony capitalists in the form of compendiums of news articles, reports, and links to relevant sites, one may visit are http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/ and https://www.opensecrets.org
The so-called revolving door between government and business is also among the primary drivers of the establishment and maintenance of these relationships. The prevalence and extent of the bi-partisan and cross-industry nature of this upper-echelon employment exchange is here illustrated (9).
Adding to the work of the above referenced men and watchdog NGOs, which establishes that crony capitalism is an institutionalized aspect of “the system” is the rare, and ironic, acknowledgement of its ill effects by a notorious offender. No less than Charles Koch (10) penned an editorial for The Wall Street Journal entitled, “Charles G. Koch: Corporate Cronyism Harms America,” from which the following quote is drawn, “[The] growing partnership between business and government is a destructive force, undermining not just our economy and our political system, but the very foundations of our culture.”

As one might expect, Mr. Koch goes on to offer reasoning for reducing governments’ role in business altogether. Although I’ll leave that argument for another article, it is worthy of note that the previously mentioned Gallup poll has 22% of respondents saying the best way improve Congress is to start over entirely, that is, all members should be fired or replaced.
As the adverse effects Mr. Koch refers to apply to investors, here are some of the high level, relevant, associated fallouts from the financial shenanigans that go on between business and politics:

  • As proposed in Naomi Klein’s latest work, “This Changes Everything, Capitalism Vs. the Climate,” corporate reliance on favors and hand-outs enables the perpetuation of business as usual, perhaps most notably: A. corporate inaction integrating global sustainability issues into their business strategy; such as transforming risks associated with the effects of Climate Change and resource scarcity into business opportunities; and B. a primary focus on meeting short-term financial goals instead of devising and implementing long-term strategies intended to ensure the firm’s viability through the creation of lasting economic value.
  • The informational advantage gained by insiders through acts of crony capitalism can have a wide range of negative consequences for honest investors that ultimately cheat the latter out of potential gains or unduly lock in losses.
  • Loss of potential investing opportunities in new businesses offering innovative technologies, business models, products, and/or services through the passage of regulations that effectively eliminate market entrants.
  • Political and investment supply chain actors are unduly enriched, thereby exacerbating the wide-ranging negative consequences of income equality, which are summarized in this TED Talk by Richard Wilkinson (11).
  • Engaging in crony capitalism is likely to be symptomatic of other corporate governance related issues, such as inadequate ethics, accountability, compensation, and transparency policies and procedures.
  • There is considerable reputational risk involved in acts of crony capitalism, i.e. if the ire of consumers, shareholders, and/or stakeholders is sufficiently aroused, corporations’ share price can be adversely affected.
  • As contained in Milton Freidman’s concept of a corporate suicide impulse (12), exhorting politicians to enact legislation that is antithetical to free enterprise can end up being a losing investment and/or result in the imposition of additional unfavorable, costly oversight and regulation, thus leaving the initiator(s) hoisted by their own petard and investors suffering losses.Given the dominance of short-termism, herd mentality, and greed that characterize markets as well as the necessity to engage in tactics that will maintain and / or increase competitive advantage, the perceived need to participate in crony capitalism is understood. That is not to say, however, that these ultimately detrimental intrinsic motivators can’t be re-conditioned. As these issues share roots in governance; it being the case that strong governance ratings are positively correlated with higher returns relative to companies with weak governance ratings; and it being a fact that governance quality is a widely accepted proxy for management quality, investors would do well to consider how to effectively mitigate against the risks of crony capitalism. Taking the following actions can be helpful in the preceding regard:
  • Discover the extent of any crony capitalist activities at investee companies and endeavor to integrate the findings into investment analyses.
  • Engage with companies to disclose all forms of payment to political entities and other political activity;
  • Vote appropriately on all governance related proxies;
  • Request third-party ESG data providers to develop a composite metric for crony capitalism;
  • Write a letter the SEC in support of the petition (13) to require corporations to fully disclose all payments to political entities and trade organisations;
  • Write a letter to your congressperson, which asks them to propose legislation that requires firms to earn a minimum score on a governance assessment administered by an independent third-party in order to be eligible for subsidies and tax breaks;
  • Partner with a governance focused non-profit organization to develop a crony capitalism index similar to The Economists’, (14) yet more robust as suggested here (15) and here (16).

As if the raft of issues institutional investors must contend with isn’t already close enough to its carrying capacity, accounting as they must for not easily quantified risks such as the effects of climate change, resource scarcity, human rights issues in supply chains, etc., one may conclude: “you’re gonna need a bigger boat.” These issues, however, are largely downstream from the headwaters wherein they were created, i.e. among corporate leadership. Ensuring that investments are restricted to companies that are governed and operated sustainably will decrease the chances of investors finding themselves underwater by reducing the volatility of the rapids that must be navigated.

Robert Schwarz is an MBA and MS holding Associate at Preventable Surprises.

(See page 3 for reference links)


1. http://www.gallup.com/poll/172859/congressional-approval-rating-languishes-low-level.aspx

2. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10000872396390443847404577629841476562610

3. http://www.transparency.org/country#USA_PublicOpinion

4. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/congressional_performance

5. http://markets.ft.com/research/Lexicon/Term?term=crony-capitalism&ftauth=1414073723603

6. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cronycapitalism.asp

7. http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/library/chart-graph/most-popular-congressional-investments?library_node=68187

8. http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/library/chart-graph/top-industries-giving-members-congress-2012-cycle?library_node=68187

9. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111221/17561617164/mapping-out-revolving-door-between-govt-big-business-venn-diagrams.shtml

10. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10000872396390443847404577629841476562610

11. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWpMr82jnf8

12. http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/policy-report/1999/3/friedman.html

13. http://www.law.columbia.edu/null/download?&exclusive=filemgr.download&file_id=59670

14. http://www.economist.com/news/international/21599041-countries-where-politically-connected-businessmen-are-most-likely-prosper-planet

15. http://globalanticorruptionblog.com/2014/03/31/the-economists-crony-capitalism-index-does-not-measure-crony-capitalism/

16. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2014/03/17/The-Economist-Calls-Out-Crony-Capitalism-But-Misses-the-Point